opium of the masses
Whenever we talk about money, we always end up asking, How should we organize the economy? –or even, What economic system should I support? “At the moment,” we explain, “I may not be using money the way I should, but when the new system (whatever it may be) is instituted, when the general money problem is solved, I in turn will become just.”
Thus we subordinate moral and individual problems to the collective problem, to the total economic system. If a man is a thief, it is not his fault; his economic conditions were such that he could be nothing else. Let us beware. If we accept this excuse on behalf of a poor person, we must accept it for everyone. Both the capitalist who exploits workers and the farmer who dabbles in the black market are also involved in impersonal economic conditions which leave them no options. As soon as we accept the supremacy of global concerns and of the system, as soon as we agree that material conditions remove our freedom to choose, we absolve all individuals of all responsibility for their use of money.
…
… human nature (with its lust for money) is corrupting the system. And that is why it is horribly wrong to believe that the problem of money can be solved by a system. It is horribly wrong thus to cheat man’s hopes and thirst for virtue and honesty. “You want justice? Then establish my system.” This is the error of all committed economists and others who think they can solve the problem without considering human nature.
But it is more than an error: it is also hypocrisy and cowardice. For then I ultimately ask no more than to believe the system-builder. It is so convenient. I don’t have to think about what I do. I don’t have to try to use my money better, to covet less, to quit stealing. It’s not my fault. All I have to do is campaign for socialism or conservatism, and as soon as society’s problems are solved, I will be just and virtuous- effortlessly.
…
But all this activity is a justification for avoiding personal decision making. My money? My work? My life? I don’t have to worry about them because I am involved in such-and-such a movement which will take care of all that for everyone once it comes to power.
Sometimes you just stumble upon the right book at the right time. Providential perhaps?
4 comments:
I can speculate on what you mean, but it would be good to hear some elaboration of your own comments.
oh MONAYYYYYYY
it's a GAAAASSSSSS
Grab that cash with both hands and make a STAAAASHHHHH
I'm not a fan of excessive blog disclosure but feel free to ask me in person :)
No economic system is still an economic system of a sort. To say an economic system undermines an individuals moral responsibility doesn't seem right to me.
Politicians and economists try to establish a system with the expectation that people are greedy by nature (will do whats best for themselves) I'm not sure what the alternative is.
BTW, hello. I read your posts every now and then. I hope that's alright.
Post a Comment