Tuesday, May 05, 2009

when words lose their meaning (5)

I stumbled upon Kasmeneo’s fashion photo stream via the Sociological Images blog. Kasmeneo regularly wears women’s clothing and posts photos of his outfits on flickr. While I have no objection to him wearing women’s clothing**, I am disappointed with his choice of vocabulary to express his opinion on the matter:

Fashion is one of my major hobbies… and mainstream men’s fashion is much too boring. So I take most of my clothes and shoes from the women’s department, as there’s just much more items, styles, colors, and materials to choose from.
That’s also my personal statement regarding equal rights - they include the right of clothing choice. What you see here is what I wear everyday, at work, in town, for shopping, whatever. And I hope that publishing my pics here can convince some men that nice clothes and shoes are not a girl’s privilege. It’s all there, you just have to take it - just like the girls do with our stuff.


The term “rights”, whether “equal rights” or “human rights”, is constantly co-opted for the purposes of demanding or justifying our desires. The line between our postmodern consumer wants and the “basic rights and dignities to which all humans are entitled” is gradually blurred.

I don’t know a single politician who doesn’t mention ten times a day “the fight for human rights” or “violation of human rights.” But because people in the West are not threatened by concentration camps and are free to say and write what they want, the more the fight for human rights gains in popularity, the more it loses any concrete content, becoming a kind of universal stance of everyone towards everything, a kind of energy that turns all human desires into rights.

~ Milan Kundera, quoted in Richard Stivers’ "The Illusion of Freedom and Equality"

If right implies choice, choice suggests desire. Indeed, right as an expansionistic concept is a metaphor for desire… Rights easily become the desires that advertising presents to us as needs, the fulfillment of which is left open to our choices.
~ “The Illusion of Freedom and Democracy” Richard Stivers


* In order to keep up with trendy summer blockbuster movies (Terminator Salvation, Star Trek) I am officially rebooting this series.

** To be fair, he makes the clear point that women do wear men’s clothing and it would be unreasonable to impose a double standard for matters of fashion. Furthermore, he actually pulls off the look fairly well. I really don't think men look that bad in skirts.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Clothing is an easy way to declare who you are so that all can see where you stand.This is one of the ways that you can seperate from the crowd. Learn more about yourself, read The Power Of Self Separation.

M. Weed said...

Using clothing as an identity-construction tool is just buying into the language of advertising. The power of consumer choice isn't power at all, it's slavery. It's an illusion to make people believe that they're free and unique when they're not. YOU should read the Stivers text she's quoting in the post, because it tears the whole "separating from the crowd" argument apart. This particular blogger knows enough about herself to know that she can't and won't be represented by what she buys.

Norman said...

I totally agree. The idea of "human rights", while I don't know when they were first coined, has likely expanded to the point where they can be interchangeable with "human wants". We already have the "right" (choice) to clothing - no one is preventing us from buying or creating (sewing, knitting, etc.) our own clothes.

T said...

Arrgh, language of human rights eaten up by the ideology of purchase-based-individualism!

Great post, thoughts, quotes.

However, if by "nice clothes and shoes" our virtual friend means "nice skirts and nice colored stockings," I'm afraid that having viewed a few of his photos I remain a man unconvinced (though deeply amused)--I'm afraid that cheap-shot rights-speak was only the beginning of his failure to graft his style choices and gender experience onto a meaningful conceptual framework.